National Transportation Safety Boards Report Case Study Essay -- Essay

home(a) conveyancing resort dining tables Report Case Study STATEMENT OF PURPOSEThis report provides a summary of the National Transportation Safety Boards Report on the accident involving a Douglas DC-8-63, N827AX, operated by ABX Air Inc. (Airborne Express). The description provides a brief synopsis of accident flight. The discussion is an trial of the history of the flight and discussion on those findings I found were most causal to the accident that were covered by the National Transportation Safety Board during their investigation. The report also explores those probable causes that attributed to the accident and action provided by the National Transportation Safety board in the prevention of similar mishaps.DESCRIPTIONOn December 22, 1996, at 1810 eastern standard time, a Douglas DC-8-63, N827AX, operated by ABX Air Inc. (Airborne Express) impacted mountainous terrain in the vicinity of Narrows, Virginia, while on a post-modification working(a) evaluation flight. The t hree flightcrew members and three maintenance/avionics technicians on board were fatally injured. The commitplane was destroyed by the impact and a postcrash fire. The functional evaluation flight, which originated from Piedmont third International Airport, Greensboro, North Carolina, was conducted on an instrument flight rules flight plan and operated under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91.The National Transportation Safety Board determined that the probable causes of this accident were the inappropriate control inputs applied by the flying buffer storage during a stall convalescence attempt, the harm of the nonflying pilot-in-command to recognize, address, and correct these inappropriate control inputs, and the failure of ABX to establish a formal functional evaluation flight program that included adequate program guidelines, use upments and pilot training for performance of these flights. Contributing to the causes of the accident were the inoperative stick sha ker stall warning system and the ABX DC-8 flight training simulators inadequate fidelity in reproducing the airplanes stall characteristics. DISCUSSIONIn all the National Transportation Safety Board concluded there were twenty-three findings that immediately contributed to this airplane accident. I will address the ones I feel carried the most impact where if the instance was removed the accident would have be... ...stall characteristics.Recommendations include requiring the Douglas Aircraft Company qualify maintenance and calibration requirements for all DC-8 stall warning systems, improving the fidelity of the simulators in reproducing the stall characteristics of the airplanes they re display, ensure ABX incorporates the revised functional evaluation stall recovery procedure in its FEF program and developing an advisory circular advising aircrew on correct stall maneuver procedures. Additional requirements were for the FAA to identify operations that require special conside ration and require special training and operational guidance. They were also to take a more active role in surveillance of FEF programs for air carriers and modify current operating instructions to clarify airworthiness and operational procedural requirements for conducting FEFs in transport-category aircraft. The Safety Board also reiterated its standing recommendation to present pilots with angle-of-attack information in a visual format and to train them to use the information to obtain maximum possible climb performance.BibliographyNational Transportation Safety Board, Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-97/05