Harrison Bergeron Essay

Kurt Vonneguts fictional fiat adopted the theories of Social peg down and Social Justice to establish a new social and effectual order. The people amended the constitution to attain equality for all. With the amendments, they created honors to retain a uniform citizenry out of their people and in the process mere(a) them of their individuality. These laws were also intended to make them think and act alike which was their report of equality. As to who is benefited from such extreme version of social have depends on whose viewpoint it was coming from. Despite their unrestricted freedoms no one was in conclusion benefited in this kind of system of rules.It was no guarantee of peace and absolute control, as in the case of Harrison. His physical and mental states were no match for the handicaps. formerly both powers were unleashed and unrestrained what resulted was a blending and coordination that produced a beautiful symphonic music of dance and music. It was symbolical of the good things that piece of ass happen or that crapper be achieved if we let our natural gifts, talents and skills work for the common good. There can be unity in diverseness and peaceful co-existence may be possible. In a controlled hostelry as this fictional one, there were no norms, values, and culture that may identify them.For norms, values and culture were what will coterie them apart. This was a robotic society where the norms were that which are forced upon them because of the handicaps some were made to wear. pleasant norms were absent because the standard (equality) was built into the system. In effect one had a common standard to follow in which to comport oneself, no less(prenominal) and no better that the others. There was only one value that stood, no one was above the other in appearance and in the discussion he gave and he got. Culture should define who and what this society was, but what would make it truly unique?There was nothing neither appealing nor en kindle in it because everything went against the natural ways of man. People followed rules not out of their volition. How were they to hit the hay the good was turning bad, and worse was turning worst, if something in their brains signaled a censure. This breastwork was basically against their good and benefit, but they had no choice but to chase what was programmed in their system. Once, this was a society that had reached the extreme end of the balance with their all-out freedoms and unchecked justs of individuals.The situation had reached unmanageable proportion that they had to resort to dramatic crisis control which brought them to the other extreme end by way of the encroachment on their rights and freedoms. This society took not only the peoples freedoms but their right senses as well. In what they figure to be the correct moves to effect change, their tumult towards a freak of nature was alarming, like when some things about hold werent quite right April not being Sp ringtime (Vonnegut, 1961). fair play and society have interchangeable attributes.Law may change a society and society may change the law. In the case of Harrison Bergeron, society had made 3 amendments to their constitution out of desire for and necessity to change. They valued to regulate and curb freedoms to a comfortable magnitude. The change in the law made this society a strictly tempered one. Lawyers and the legal system do not have a place in this society anymore. The Handicapper General proceeded to punish without trial law breakers. The only collide withensive that can be committed was taking ones handicaps off and that did not need investigation and defense.The crime and the criminal are self-evident. The fictional society does not have any direct similarities in nowadayss time. However, the inference to the curtailment of freedoms is plenty. When a society does not cease an artist to express his heart in his art, the Harrison Bergerons to criticize the government wh ich should be for, by and of the people, and ease the fear of ordinary citizens, they are the translations of Vonneguts transgressions of freedoms in his fictional society. Instead of seeking for equality in the extreme, working with diversity might be the better option.