How Did the Nuremberg Trials Work and Who Was Tried and Why? Essay

The war crime trials held at Nuremberg are one of the intimately swell up-known trials against hu humanity in history. These trials were very complex and consisted of few wad from many different countries. Justice was a big set forth of these trials and jurist was served to the nation who were tried and inpatiented through and throughout this complex process. The specific name for these trials was the external Military Tribunal, often referred to as IMT (Taylor Intro). These were complex trials which seek to break smart legal ground on major issues of international law of nature (Taylor 4).Simply, the Nuremberg trials were created to convict the plurality who were involved in the Holocaust and the destruction of Poland as well as other events. The events of the Nazi era were a major part of the Nuremberg trials (Taylor 3). These trials were much to a greater extent than intricate than the average person would debate. It changed the lives of many, many people non stil l were the families of those convicted but of the people who sat in on the hearings were affected. Everyone who was remotely involved in these trials was affected by them. But what law was the planetary Military Tribunal enforcing? Ordinary courts and trials are based on the statuses of sovereign nations.However, the IMT was no ordinary court. It was established by the United States and lead other major European Nations, and the laws by which the IMT was bound were non the laws of those or of any other nations. For its rules on crime the IMT looked primarily to the international laws of war, violations were called war crimes (Taylor 5). Humanitarianism played a large role in the culture of the laws for Nuremberg (Taylor 5). The laws by which the tribunal would follow were not chosen over a days time but, they were well thought out, reviewed and reviewed again. This was necessary for the honest reason that there would be no way for the accused to scourge the system because somet hing in the wording was ill-timed.One of the most famous trials from Nuremberg was that of Goering Hermann Goering. Goering was commandant in chief of the air force, president of the Reichstag, and prime minister of Russia. He was found guilty for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity (Goldensohn 101). It took much more than tho taking a look at what Goering did during his time of doing these disastrous things, they looked at his parents, his childhood they took a look at his personal issues. They went deep teeming even to look at his past wives (Goldensohn 101). Unlike most people convicted throughout the trials Goering was willing to accept that he truly did these things. He admitted his wrong doings (Goldensohn 102). Usually the convicted would try to fight the system.Goering was a smart man and knew it was easier to accept these things because he knew he did them. Goering was willing to say he was Hitlers successor he worked face-to-face with Hitler (Goldensohn 102). That right there could have been ample for the penalty of ending. Goering believed that his childhood has no major effect on his vainglorious personality, but that his childhood qualities were the same he acquired now he didnt change much. Goerings trial ended in him being sentenced to death by hanging. Two hours before this scheduled execution, on October 15, 1946 he connected suicide in his cell (Goldensohn 101). Goerings case was one of the more complex and more interesting cases. He understood what was going on and didnt fear for his life because he knew all of the things he did were wrong.Walther contract was minister of economics from 1937 to 1945 (Goldensohn 76). He was tried at Nuremberg. Unlike Goering, backlash feared for his life and would become defensive and teary-eyed when asked about his political activity. He claimed he was only a small part of the things that happened and had no conception what was going on (Goldensohn 76). Funk did not lead the destructive modus vivendi that Goering did but what he did in his adult years was enough to absorb him into these trials and be convicted. In 1931 he retired from the editorship of the paper, because I felt that the National Socialists were current to assume power and I was drawn to the movement.Germany was in a crisis. Unemployment was great. conformation struggles existed (Goldensohn 77). Funk was never part of the inner circle of Hitler, He was not a politician (he only headed the office for Private business for a few months) (Goldensohn 79). Then average person today in 2011 would think that all the people tried in Nuremberg hated the Jews and were anti-Semitic. Funk was actually a friend with many Jewish people, he worked with Jews he did not hate them (Goldensohn 80). At Nuremberg they accused Funk for the rearmament of Germany. Funk claims that it was false and it was in the hands of Georg Thomas (Goldensohn 81). In the end, on October 1st, 1946 Funk was sentenced to life in prison. He was released in 1957 for health problems and later died in 1960.The Nuremberg trials were different and more complex than most trials. They were held to serve justice. In the end justice was served. The International Military Tribunal was successful in what they wanted to accomplish in the first place. These trials are not fully understood by many especially in the laws that they followed and how the trials were run. Having multiple nations involved and defendants from many nations it became hard through translation and things like that. The Nuremberg trials broke the legal ground internationally that it sought to break.Jacklyn Oleksak 3/23/11Works Cited Pd. 2Dodd, Christopher J. Letters from Nuremberg. impertinent York Crown Publishing, 2007. Print.This book did not help me as much as I thought it would. Titled Letters from Nuremberg it sounded like it would help. After class period various pages I noticed it was more of a novel of enjoyment rather than a usef ul choice. It was a slightly leisurely re microbe to understand and the authors credentials were very good but I only used a line of two from the whole book. I got it at the Plainedge customary Library with two other books about the trials.Goldensohn, Leon. The Nuremberg Interviews. modern York Alfred A Knopf, 2004. Print.Goldensohn has the best credentials of all. He was the one interviewing the defendants in his book. Therefore, all his learning was accurate. The books reliability was very high because it had so much information and by checking other sources, it was all correct. It was written a bit above an elementary reading level but I was able to understand it fairly well and get the information I unavoidable. I accessed it at the Public library while looking through books for my research.Gormley, Larry. Hermann W. Gring. Ehistory archives. 2001. OSU department of history. 17 jar against 2011. .This website was fairly stabilising. I didnt use it as a primary source b ut rather as a source to check information. It was helpful in the part of my essay about Goering. It gave me a good oversight of what that paragraph would be about and then I got the more complex details in the Nuremberg Interviews book. I accessed it through right search on google.Linder, Doug. The Subsequent Nuremberg Trials An Overview. World famous trials. 2000. Nuremberg trials. 15 March 2011. This like the Ehistory archives website gave me a great overview of what my paper was going to be about. It was very useful in helping me find out what was essential for my paper and what was not as important. It helped my research become more detail and it made it a better paper all together. I accessed it in the PHS library from searching on advances search Google.Taylor, Ella. Crimes against humanity. The Village Voice. 29 September- 5 October 2011. ProQuest. PHS library. 22 March 2011. http//proquest.umi.comThis website did not help me at all. It was not as to the point as the othe r resources I used. It was vague and unhelpful. It did have some correct information and it was a knowledgeable source but it was not what I needed to write my paper. I accessed it through the PHS databases.Taylor, Telford. The anatomy of the Nuremberg trials. New York Alfred A Knopf, 1992. PrintThis was my most valuable source. It gave me much more than I needed and gave me a variety of information to choose from. It was not an easy reading level to read at. It was most likely written for knowing adults but I was able to decipher the information I needed for my research. The information is accurate, I checked through other sources. This was my most helpful guide throughout the research. I accessed it at the Public library.